A DOCTOR IN THE HOUSE MAHATHIR PDF

adminComment(0)

PDF | On Jan 1, , Timo Kivimäki and others published A Doctor in the House : The Memoirs of Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad by Mahathir bin Mohamad. Request PDF on ResearchGate | On Aug 1, , Timo Kivimäki and others published A Doctor in the House: The Memoirs of Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).


A Doctor In The House Mahathir Pdf

Author:NECOLE MUTNER
Language:English, German, French
Country:United Arab Emirates
Genre:Personal Growth
Pages:771
Published (Last):21.11.2015
ISBN:383-3-41467-179-9
ePub File Size:21.32 MB
PDF File Size:9.50 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Registration Required]
Downloads:30562
Uploaded by: AVERY

A Doctor in the House - Free download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online The book titled A Doctor in the House: The Memoirs of Tun Dr Mahathir . Malaysia's former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad's () book is an impressive study of modern political history. It contains crucial insights for people . New_A Doctor In The House The Memoir of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. Author. Publisher. Pages, Download, 0. File size, MB. Rating. Download.

The ban was only lifted after Mahathir became prime minister in ; he thus served as a minister and deputy prime minister while being the author of a banned book. Milne and Diane K. Mauzy argue that Mahathir's relentless attacks were the principal cause of Abdul Rahman's downfall and subsequent resignation as prime minister in Razak encouraged Mahathir back into the party, and had him appointed as a Senator in He also returned to the House of Representatives , winning the Kedah-based seat of Kubang Pasu unopposed in the election.

The contest was considered to be a battle for the succession of the party's leadership, with both Razak and his deputy, Hussein Onn , in declining health. When Razak died the following year, Hussein as his successor was forced to choose between the three men to be deputy prime minister; he also considered the ambitious minister Ghazali Shafie. Each of Mahathir's rivals had significant political liabilities: Ghazali, having been defeated by the others for a vice-presidency, lacked the support of UMNO members; Ghafar had no higher education and was not fluent in English; and Razaleigh was young, inexperienced and, critically, unmarried.

But Hussein's decision was not easy. Hussein and Mahathir were not close allies, and Hussein knew the choice of Mahathir would displease Abdul Rahman, still alive and revered as the father of Malaysia's independence. After six weeks of indecision Mahathir was, much to his surprise, appointed as Hussein's deputy.

The appointment meant that Mahathir was the anointed successor to the prime ministership. Hussein was a cautious leader who rejected many of Mahathir's bold policy proposals. While the relationship between Hussein and Mahathir was distant, Ghazali and Razaleigh became Hussein's closest advisers, often bypassing the more senior Mahathir when accessing Hussein. Nonetheless, when Hussein relinquished power due to ill health in , Mahathir succeeded him unopposed and with his blessing.

The position of Yang di-Pertuan Agong , the Malaysian head of state, was due to rotate in to either the elderly Idris Shah II of Perak or the controversial Iskandar of Johor , who had only a few years earlier been convicted of manslaughter.

Thus Mahathir had grave reservations about the two Sultans, who were both activist rulers of their own states. The proposal would also remove the power to declare a state of emergency from the Agong and place it with the prime minister. The Agong at the time, Ahmad Shah of Pahang , agreed with the proposals in principle but baulked when he realised that the proposal would also deem Sultans to assent to laws passed by state assemblies.

Supported by the Sultans, the Agong refused to assent to the constitutional amendments, which had by then passed both houses of Parliament with comfortable majorities. One surprise after another has come for the last two decades. As noted by Abshead : Dr. His critics use this as an example of what they feel to be Dr. However, he is totally accessible. These are the brought to the attention of various Ministers to check and examine — grouse against red tape, condition of public facilities, street lights that are not working, new ideas that strike him as he travels abroad.

These jottings represent his total commitment to his work. Abshead, , p. When not working on national proposals as ascribed to him as an elected leader, K reflects upon his society in his writings which have been mentioned earlier, The Malay Dilemma , The Challenge and The Way Forward — Vision and recently in at the age of 72, K took one-month break to work on his memoirs.

It is important to mention what K does when he is not working on matters relating to administrating the nation. He is one who loves cooking, interior designing, woodworking he has even built his own boat , horse-riding, travelling, and also writing poems.

It can also be analyzed that through these activities, we can find symbolic manifestations translated from the personal to the public and professional domains in the form of significant projects he has initiated through his long years of leadership. In his own words, K related politics with his medical training: The first lesson is the methodical way that doctors approach medical problems. Observance, history taking, physical examinations, narrowing the diagnosis and then deciding on the most likely diagnosis and the treatment required.

These are useful in any problem in life, and they serve me well in attending top political problems. Counter-measures can be developed.

The essential thing is to develop diagnostic skills. It can explain a great deal how K has, in his sixteen-year rule thus far managed to systematically eliminate his political opponents in a manner as a physician, without remorse, amputates a cancerous organ.

As it relates to the discussion on network of enterprise, if there is an ensemble of metaphors by which we can analyze K with, it is a mix of K as a surgeon-anesthetist, a captain of industry, a school headmaster, an Asian Machiavelli, a Zulu warrior, a company Chief Executive Officer, a don of a political underworld and a rebel who finds new causes. All these metaphors can be applied to K to get a holographic and panoramic view of his modality of thought and expression quite transparent and applicable to different situations.

Thus, the sum of modalities of thought K has trained himself in, symbolically manifested through his undertakings either as a profession or as a hobby have been used in his major creative work; governing the nation.

It is interesting to note that, in recapitulating this proposal for a more in-depth analysis of Mahathir the statesman, there is not yet scientific study such as this one proposed using the ESA-cs method, precisely which attempt to look at the soul of a nation through the inner workings of the mind of, perhaps, its most glorified Prime Minister. Contemporary definitions of creativity and the creative individual continue to highlight aspect of creating new domains; one definition by Csikszentmihalyi note that: Creativity is any act, idea, or product that changes an existing domain or that transforms an existing domain into a new one.

Ochse, , p. Wallace and Gruber, , pp. If in the case of scientific and artistic creativity, the subject of study maybe analyzed as one who seeks to, in the former, test hypothesis, and conjure theories which can paradigmatically shift the thinking in that particular fields, in the latter, the subject may also be considered as one who attempts to create something new, which calls for a new definition of what is discovered.

Elaborating the aforementioned perspectives on creativity, it is imperative, when we look at the creative individual as a problem-solver within the mould of the Evolving Systems Approach, to quote Gruber and Wallace : Generally speaking, people think in order to solve problems.

The excellent problem-solver may have gotten beyond that point: problem solving comes relatively easy. It may be apt to say that the creator sets himself or herself problems in order to think. The creator is not necessarily a better problem- solver. The main point is to develop a new point of view, a perspective from which new problems are seen and old ones are seen in a new light. I refer to the enterprise as a political imagination and social invention.

Political imagination cannot be any different from as an enterprise of problem solving, problem finding, and paradigm shifting. Manifestations of the end product may be looked at in the form of social inventions, which have their utilities in the improvement of the lives of a great number of people.

Ideas for social improvements be they, in the political, educational, cultural or scientific spheres may be first accepted or decreed to be accepted by the peoples whom the national leader governed and perhaps, if these ideas are of appealing quality, may be accepted by peoples outside the territorial states or boundaries.

One such idea may be that of a bank for hard-core poor The Grameen Bank tested, tried and true by one Professor Yunus Friedmann, We now look at the analysis of Mahathir Mohamad as a problem solver in light of the typology mentioned above.

The problems he presented and the solutions proposed were controversial enough for the book to be banned for ten years; the ban lifted by K himself when he became Prime Minister.

His diagnosis of the bloody riots is as such: What went wrong? Obviously a lot went wrong.

In the first place the Government started off on the wrong premise. It is believed that there Have been racial harmony in the past and that the Sino-Malay cooperation to achieve independence was an example of racial harmony.

It is believed that the Chinese were only interested in business and the acquisition of wealth, and the Malays wished to become Government servants. These ridiculous assumptions led to policies that undermined whatever superficial understanding between the Malays and non-Malays. On top of this the Government glorifying in at it either the opposition or its supporters. The gulf between the government and the people widened so that the Government was no longer able to feel the pulse of the people or interpret it correctly.

It was therefore unable to appreciate the radical change in the thinking of the people from the time of the Independence and as the elections approached.

And finally when it won by such a reduced majority the Government went into a state of shock which marred its judgement. And so murder and arson and anarchy exploded in 13 May That was what went wrong.

Mohamad, p. K sets himself such a problem not only in order to make him think, but to make the others react to the issues raised. His point of view developed out of his paradigm guides the policies to be made in national development — for better or for worse. It is interesting to note that fifteen years after K wrote The Malay Dilemma with such a problem-finding illustration, he began his second major work The Challenge with a simple style of problem posing.

K wrote: The Malays have emerged from a long period of backwardness only to be pulled in different directions by conflicting forces, some of which seek to undo whatever progress that has been made and plunge the entire community into the Dark Ages. Mohamad, , p. K wrote: One of the saddest ironies of the recent times is that Islam, the faith that once made its followers progressive and powerful, is being invoked to promote retrogression which will bring in its wake weakness and eventual collapse.

A force for enlightenment, it is being turned into a rationale for narrow- mindedness; an inspiration towards unity, it is being twisted into an instrument of division and destruction.

He added: At the same time, other sections of the community are being confused by attempts to equate Islam with socialism, using the ambiguity inherit words like justice, equality and brotherhood. In fact, when he was writing to the Sunday Times in the s, the problem identified was with the British colonials.

As one who grew up without much inclination to socializing, K has developed a political style of problem solving which illustrates indifference and projects the image Machiavellian. At school, they say knowingly, he was a loner: not given to mixing, always hanging around at the back when the team games were being organized. In adulthood, they like to add his favorite hobbies have included riding and sailing — again, relatively solitary activities.

Navigation menu

And ones that require keeping an eye on the horizon. The arrests spread geographically from Peninsular Malaysia to Sarawak where local environmentalists and anti-timber logging natives were also detained. The waves of arrests, though lessening after October, continued until the number of detainees reached a peak figure of in December. K relates medicine to Sherlock Holmes- type of investigation.

Information

When asked about his writing skills for example, K said: … It is easy for me to examine a patient and then prescribe an appropriate medicine … but to be a writer is more difficult…. Medicine is something like detective work. I read Conan Doyle first, then read medicine.

The way Conan Doyle solves his problems is the way the doctor solves his cases. Teik, , p. Within the context of discussion of K as problem-solver, the metaphor of doctor-politician-Sherlock Holmes is evident.

A Doctor in the House: The Memoirs of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad

If we are to analyze this metaphor further within the context of Malaysian society, it is also evident that throughout his political career, K has employed a holistic approach to problem solving in the political domain. His remedies and cures for the nation involves amputating his political rivals deemed as cancerous, prescribing depressants for points of view anathema to his political goals, injecting tranquilizers into the populace so that political reality is his and only his, administering strongest medicine to political, economic and social ills, giving stimulants to Malaysians so that they become good workers for the international capitalist system, and performing plastic surgery in areas of concern in all the spheres of Malaysian living so that they become presentable in the eyes of international audience.

Thus K, in sustaining power problem solves by administering and overseeing onto society what doctors and their variants would: hypnosis, placebo, psychoanalysis, essential vitamins, dialysis, mental therapy, physical therapy and of late, prozac.

These are combined with traditional medicine such as those extracted from cultural arguments, religious rhetoric and historical claims. He also returned to the House of Representatives , winning the Kedah-based seat of Kubang Pasu unopposed in the election.

The contest was considered to be a battle for the succession of the party's leadership, with both Razak and his deputy, Hussein Onn , in declining health.

When Razak died the following year, Hussein as his successor was forced to choose between the three men to be deputy prime minister; he also considered the ambitious minister Ghazali Shafie. Each of Mahathir's rivals had significant political liabilities: Ghazali, having been defeated by the others for a vice-presidency, lacked the support of UMNO members; Ghafar had no higher education and was not fluent in English; and Razaleigh was young, inexperienced and, critically, unmarried.

But Hussein's decision was not easy. Hussein and Mahathir were not close allies, and Hussein knew the choice of Mahathir would displease Abdul Rahman, still alive and revered as the father of Malaysia's independence. After six weeks of indecision Mahathir was, much to his surprise, appointed as Hussein's deputy.

tulipebook

The appointment meant that Mahathir was the anointed successor to the prime ministership. Hussein was a cautious leader who rejected many of Mahathir's bold policy proposals. While the relationship between Hussein and Mahathir was distant, Ghazali and Razaleigh became Hussein's closest advisers, often bypassing the more senior Mahathir when accessing Hussein. Nonetheless, when Hussein relinquished power due to ill health in , Mahathir succeeded him unopposed and with his blessing.

The position of Yang di-Pertuan Agong , the Malaysian head of state, was due to rotate in to either the elderly Idris Shah II of Perak or the controversial Iskandar of Johor , who had only a few years earlier been convicted of manslaughter. Thus Mahathir had grave reservations about the two Sultans, who were both activist rulers of their own states.

The proposal would also remove the power to declare a state of emergency from the Agong and place it with the prime minister. The Agong at the time, Ahmad Shah of Pahang , agreed with the proposals in principle but baulked when he realised that the proposal would also deem Sultans to assent to laws passed by state assemblies. Supported by the Sultans, the Agong refused to assent to the constitutional amendments, which had by then passed both houses of Parliament with comfortable majorities.

The press took the side of the government, although a large minority of Malays, including conservative UMNO politicians, and an even larger proportion of the Chinese community supported the Sultans. After five months, the crisis resolved, as Mahathir and the Sultans agreed to a compromise.

The Agong would retain the power to declare a state of emergency, but if he refused to assent to a bill, the bill would be returned to Parliament, which could then override the Agong's veto. Mahathir considered that an automotive industry was essential to Malaysia becoming an industrial nation.He advocated a mixed economy based on religious principles namely Islam and have consistently used this leitmotif to ideologically sustain power throughout his development as a creative and problem-solving individual.

K wrote: One of the saddest ironies of the recent times is that Islam, the faith that once made its followers progressive and powerful, is being invoked to promote retrogression which will bring in its wake weakness and eventual collapse.

Mahathir: The Secret of the Malaysian Success. Jay Lau. The letter, which soon became public, called for Abdul Rahman's resignation. The book titled A Doctor in the House: He is Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad who perhaps has been for the last decade quietly haunting my conscience for a number of reasons, which I present in the following, has helped make me understand better what creativity within an authoritarian context and oxy-moronically in the moral domain can mean.

Celine Yap. Hussein and Mahathir were not close allies, and Hussein knew the choice of Mahathir would displease Abdul Rahman, still alive and revered as the father of Malaysia's independence.